Comments for Redhia's Respite http://redhia.wordpress.com A break. A breath. Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:30:16 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on SSRI antidepressants during pregnancy? No! by www.educationadvice4u.info » SSRI antidepressants during pregnancy? No! http://redhia.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/ssri-antidepressants-during-pregnancy-no/#comment-8 www.educationadvice4u.info » SSRI antidepressants during pregnancy? No! Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:30:16 +0000 http://redhia.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/ssri-antidepressants-during-pregnancy-no/#comment-8 [...] redhia added an interesting post on SSRI antidepressants during pregnancy? No!.Here’s a small excerpt:The day before the news stories broke, the Centers for Disease Control spun the news in advance with a press release headlined, “New Study Finds Few Risks of Birth Defects from Antidepressant Use During Pregnancy” (CDC Division of Media … [...] [...] redhia added an interesting post on SSRI antidepressants during pregnancy? No!.Here’s a small excerpt:The day before the news stories broke, the Centers for Disease Control spun the news in advance with a press release headlined, “New Study Finds Few Risks of Birth Defects from Antidepressant Use During Pregnancy” (CDC Division of Media … [...]

]]> Comment on SSRI antidepressants during pregnancy? No! by The Pregnancy Childbirth Guide » Blog Archive » Cycle Menstrual Pregnancy - Overwhelming Love http://redhia.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/ssri-antidepressants-during-pregnancy-no/#comment-7 The Pregnancy Childbirth Guide » Blog Archive » Cycle Menstrual Pregnancy - Overwhelming Love Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:08:44 +0000 http://redhia.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/ssri-antidepressants-during-pregnancy-no/#comment-7 [...] SSRI antidepressants during pregnancy? No!The Wall Street Journal s coverage was titled Reassurance on Antidepressants in Pregnancy. The day before the news stories broke, the Centers for Disease Control spun the news in advance with a press release headlined, … [...] [...] SSRI antidepressants during pregnancy? No!The Wall Street Journal s coverage was titled Reassurance on Antidepressants in Pregnancy. The day before the news stories broke, the Centers for Disease Control spun the news in advance with a press release headlined, … [...]

]]> Comment on SSRI antidepressants during pregnancy? No! by   SSRI antidepressants during pregnancy? No! by medTRIALS.info http://redhia.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/ssri-antidepressants-during-pregnancy-no/#comment-6   SSRI antidepressants during pregnancy? No! by medTRIALS.info Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:20:30 +0000 http://redhia.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/ssri-antidepressants-during-pregnancy-no/#comment-6 [...] not true. The study found that obese women who did not use SSRIs had an …Original post by redhia delivered by Medtrials and [...] [...] not true. The study found that obese women who did not use SSRIs had an …Original post by redhia delivered by Medtrials and [...]

]]> Comment on Choosing organizations to support by redhia http://redhia.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/choosing-organizations-to-support/#comment-5 redhia Wed, 03 Oct 2007 06:24:20 +0000 http://redhia.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/choosing-organizations-to-support/#comment-5 Thanks for the comment and for speaking up and know that you are not the only one. I had received emails from others who were also expressing gratitude. So it seems many wished to know. And yes, it seems important for the organization to be taken seriously that it must do the certain things that one can take for granted that other organizations do. For example, very important by law that the annual reports are made available, but yet it seems that for 25 years, they have not! That is, I can not see them having ever been available on the website even before the recent updating of the site, which is being cited as the reason why they are not found. The Internet Wayback Machine does not turn up this information. So this is one example. But a concerning one, yes. However, I must say that I am not an expert by any means, which is why I ask the questions. I am still learning the culture, the laws, and the mores. Thanks for the comment and for speaking up and know that you are not the only one. I had received emails from others who were also expressing gratitude. So it seems many wished to know. And yes, it seems important for the organization to be taken seriously that it must do the certain things that one can take for granted that other organizations do. For example, very important by law that the annual reports are made available, but yet it seems that for 25 years, they have not! That is, I can not see them having ever been available on the website even before the recent updating of the site, which is being cited as the reason why they are not found. The Internet Wayback Machine does not turn up this information. So this is one example. But a concerning one, yes. However, I must say that I am not an expert by any means, which is why I ask the questions. I am still learning the culture, the laws, and the mores.

]]> Comment on Simplify by redhia http://redhia.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/hello-world/#comment-4 redhia Wed, 03 Oct 2007 06:15:22 +0000 #comment-4 Thank you for your comment. I like this metaphor: "I always check the water before I start stirring the pot." Thank you for your comment. I like this metaphor: “I always check the water before I start stirring the pot.”

]]> Comment on Simplify by msovoice http://redhia.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/hello-world/#comment-3 msovoice Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:35:03 +0000 #comment-3 Hmm, you said: "Recently, it has been found out that the ICAN “moderators” have been BCC (blind copying) private emails that they start with members of the ICAN support group list. Now I will keep all my emails public to the list, which is a shame, because there have been the starts of what seemed to maybe be the beginnings of good private email friendships with these women who emailed be privately off the list." REALLY? I must have missed this. I know there have been a couple of e-mails sent to me alone that seemed to have been intended for the list. Sometimes we hit "reply" when we should hit "reply all". "But who can tell who can be trusted, and who is doing this and who is not? I think that this ICAN acts more like a clique or a club than an organization to be taken seriously." Hmm, again this hasn't been my experience. But anytime I start up with a group, I always check the water before I start stirring the pot . . . Hmm, you said:
“Recently, it has been found out that the ICAN “moderators” have been BCC (blind copying) private emails that they start with members of the ICAN support group list. Now I will keep all my emails public to the list, which is a shame, because there have been the starts of what seemed to maybe be the beginnings of good private email friendships with these women who emailed be privately off the list.”

REALLY? I must have missed this. I know there have been a couple of e-mails sent to me alone that seemed to have been intended for the list. Sometimes we hit “reply” when we should hit “reply all”.

“But who can tell who can be trusted, and who is doing this and who is not? I think that this ICAN acts more like a clique or a club than an organization to be taken seriously.”

Hmm, again this hasn’t been my experience. But anytime I start up with a group, I always check the water before I start stirring the pot . . .

]]> Comment on Choosing organizations to support by msovoice http://redhia.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/choosing-organizations-to-support/#comment-2 msovoice Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:31:07 +0000 http://redhia.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/choosing-organizations-to-support/#comment-2 I definitely appreciated your questions. I recently joined ICAN, and certainly they must agree that accountability is a good thing. I hope you do receive some answers or that at least the BOD will consider becoming more transparent with regard to how things are run. I definitely appreciated your questions. I recently joined ICAN, and certainly they must agree that accountability is a good thing. I hope you do receive some answers or that at least the BOD will consider becoming more transparent with regard to how things are run.

]]>